sasha_feather: Retro-style poster of skier on pluto.   (Default)
sasha_feather ([personal profile] sasha_feather) wrote 2013-07-08 11:31 pm (UTC)

Thank you! I will add your convention to the Wiki list. It looks like you do a good job. I also think that smaller conventions get more leeway than bigger ones do due to money concerns, but it almost seems from this list that smaller cons do better...

I found money for ASL at WisCon (we also have a limited budget) by applying for a grant through the Wisconsin Dept. of Health Services. Something to consider. In order to prep the ASL interpreters and the CART person, I sent them a list of jargon terms and names. I got the Guest of Honor speeches ahead of time from our liaisons and sent them to her. Hmm, maybe I should make another post about this!

Waiting until there is "significant need" is problematic in my view. Why would Deaf or hearing impaired people come to a convention where there are no interpreters? On the other hand, if we start providing interpreters, captioning, etc, we may attract Deaf/HoH folks to our spaces, in a "If you Build it they will Come" way. For a very small convention this may not be fiscally possible, I know. I might post again about interpreters. Some cons (Convergence) use volunteers.

Thanks for your comments!


Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org