Or, the court might just decide that since most cons (Dragcon may vary) are selling MEMBERSHIPS and the ADA explicitly excludes private groups not formed for the purpose of discrimination, that most cons are not subject to the ADA.
And then there is what "is" "reasonable".
Various cons have looked into this and decided that whether or not they are subject to the ADA they have a moral obligation to do the best job they can. But a court ruling might just make some cons do less.
Just saying ...
On the other hand, it would seem to me (and I'm not a lawyer) that the attendees would have a better time going after the hotels including the Dragoncon hotels.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
branchandroot
or, be careful what you ask for ...
Date: 2012-09-10 01:44 pm (UTC)And then there is what "is" "reasonable".
Various cons have looked into this and decided that whether or not they are subject to the ADA they have a moral obligation to do the best job they can. But a court ruling might just make some cons do less.
Just saying ...
On the other hand, it would seem to me (and I'm not a lawyer) that the attendees would have a better time going after the hotels including the Dragoncon hotels.